The Noah Project

Rebuilding a sustainable world.


Leave a comment

Science vs. World Leaders

In Medical Daily, Anoopa Singh documents a study that links GMO food toxins to anemia and other blood disorders:

“…in a new study where mice were fed endotoxin, researchers found that even the smallest, and once deemed safe, doses of the toxin appeared to cause harmful immune reactions.

Researchers looked at immune reactions in the exposed mice after one, three, and seven days. They found that after one day, the mouse’s blood contained many inflammation-inducing molecules. These inflammatory molecules were not localized to anywhere in particular, indicating that the blood was rejecting the toxin and the immune system was sending out molecules to mark it for immune attack. By the third day, the level of inflammatory agents in the blood had significantly increased, further indicating that the toxin was creating a negative effect in the mice, even at a small dose.

In terms of the blood itself, many adverse changes were observed as well. After three days, there was a significant reduction in red blood cell counts and hemoglobin in the blood. This led to hypochromia, or some loss of the red color of blood, because without enough red blood cells and hemoglobin, there cannot be enough oxygen in the blood – as a result, deoxygenated blood is very dark and nearly brown, while oxygenated blood is bright red. Between days three and seven, hemoglobin levels in the mice decreased by fivefold.”

World leaders nontheless claim these products are safe.  In a speech at the World Food Prize Foundation, US Secretary of State, John Kerry called them “smart” crops that can save money, save the environment and save lives:

“It is a virtuous circle.  And through innovation, we believe we can help alleviate the level of hunger and malnutrition today, but more than that, we can, hopefully, live up to our responsibilities for the future.”

In a major speech, UK Environment Secretary Owen Paterson, claims:

“the use of more precise technology and the greater regulatory scrutiny probably makes GMOs even safer than conventional plants and food”.

Ironically, Mr Paterson spoke at Rothamsted Research in Hertfordshire, where he toured the only active GM crop trial in the UK.

It should also be noted that:

The United States is the world’s biggest producer and consumer of genetically modified food, and the U.S.-based Monsanto company is the world’s largest developer of genetically altered crops.  The company has engineered crops that thrive in some of the world’s worst climates and can protect themselves from diseases and pests.  The U.S. has promoted these crops as part of a solution to alleviate world hunger.  But many countries avoid genetically engineered plants fearing harmful long-term effects.


1 Comment

GMO and Monsanto Roundup: Glyphosate Weedkiller in our Food and Water?

This article by Colin Todhunter, in Global Research, is so alarming, I’m posting it in its entirety.  It encapsulates everything that is wrong with GM crops – from their impact on the environment to the lack of independent research to the pressure this industry exerts on governments and the scientific community.

“Historians may look back and write about how willing we are to sacrifice our children and jeopardize future generations with a massive experiment that is based on false promises and flawed science just to benefit the bottom line of a commercial enterprise.” So said Don Huber in referring to the use of glyphosate and genetically modified crops. Huber was speaking at Organic Connections conference in Regina, Canada, late 2012.
Huber is an emeritus professor in plant pathology at Purdue University in the US and has worked with the Department of Homeland Security to reduce the impact of plant disease outbreaks. His words are well worth bearing in mind given that a new study commissioned by Friends of the Earth Europe (FoE) and GM Freeze has found that people in 18 countries across Europe have been found to have traces of glyphosate in their urine (1).
Friends of the Earth Europe commissioned laboratory tests on urine samples from volunteers in 18 countries across Europe and found that on average 44 percent of samples contained glyphosate. The proportion of positive samples varied between countries, with Malta, Germany, the UK and Poland having the most positive tests, and lower levels detected in Macedonia and Switzerland. All the volunteers who provided samples live in cities, and none had handled or used glyphosate products in the run-up to the tests. Continue reading